Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Profile Products LLC has 2 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These 2 actions are split between 2 distinct examiners, meaning each pending matter has a unique reviewer. The portfolio also spans 2 distinct art units, reflecting different technical classifications for the applications. This distribution of 2 pending office actions across multiple examiners and units suggests a diverse technical focus within the company's mechanical systems portfolio.
The busiest examiner, JORDAN, MORGAN T, is managing 1 busiest examiner pending action. This accounts for a portion of the 2 total pending office actions. Because there are 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, the prosecution of each application is likely to proceed independently. Practitioners should be prepared to address the specific concerns of two different examiners in two different art units. This lack of overlap means that success in one art unit may not influence the outcome in the other. Managing 2 distinct examiners requires a flexible strategy that accounts for individual examiner tendencies.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| JORDAN, MORGAN T | 1 | 52.8% | +34.0% |
| SCHMID, BROOK VICTORIA | 1 | 28.0% | +60.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18760234 | ORCHID PROPAGATION MEDIUM | SCHMID, BROOK VICTORIA | 15d overdue |
| 19026762 | HYDROPONIC GROWING MEDIUM | JORDAN, MORGAN T | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18760234 | ORCHID PROPAGATION MEDIUM | SCHMID, BROOK VICTORIA | 15d overdue |
| 19026762 | HYDROPONIC GROWING MEDIUM | JORDAN, MORGAN T | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3643 | 1 |
| 3642 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19026762 | HYDROPONIC GROWING MEDIUM | JORDAN, MORGAN T | 3643 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 17, 2025 |
| 18760234 | ORCHID PROPAGATION MEDIUM | SCHMID, BROOK VICTORIA | 3642 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | 15d overdue | Pending | Jul 01, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial