Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Profusa Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. The portfolio's current activity is limited to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, showing a narrow point of contact within the patent office. This structure implies that the company's immediate intellectual property goals are tied to a specific technical niche rather than a broad array of semiconductor applications.
JUNG, JONATHAN Y is identified as the busiest examiner for the company, handling 1 pending office action. Because the workload is not distributed, the prosecution strategy must be tailored specifically to the preferences and history of this 1 examiner. The absence of other pending actions means that the company's current patent office trajectory is entirely focused on the resolution of this 1 examiner's requirements. Success in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics area depends on successfully navigating the 1 distinct art unit's standards through the 1 pending office action assigned to JUNG, JONATHAN Y.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| JUNG, JONATHAN Y | 1 | 72.6% | +16.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18979367 | OPTICAL FILTER DEVICE, SYSTEM, AND METHODS FOR IMPROVED OPTICAL REJECTION OF HIGH ANGLE OF INCIDENCE (AOI) LIGHT | JUNG, JONATHAN Y | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18979367 | OPTICAL FILTER DEVICE, SYSTEM, AND METHODS FOR IMPROVED OPTICAL REJECTION OF HIGH ANGLE OF INCIDENCE (AOI) LIGHT | JUNG, JONATHAN Y | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2871 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18979367 | OPTICAL FILTER DEVICE, SYSTEM, AND METHODS FOR IMPROVED OPTICAL REJECTION OF HIGH ANGLE OF INCIDENCE (AOI) LIGHT | JUNG, JONATHAN Y | 2871 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 12, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial