Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Project44 LLC has 1 pending office action within the Computing & Software technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, MAHARAJ, DEVIKA S, who is the busiest examiner for the company with 1 pending office action. The prosecution is localized within 1 distinct art unit.
The presence of 1 pending office action indicates a focused effort in the software sector. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved, the company's current USPTO activity is centralized. MAHARAJ, DEVIKA S is the sole examiner responsible for the company's active patent prosecution.
The concentration of the workload under a single examiner suggests a streamlined prosecution process. Because there is only 1 busiest examiner pending action, the technical focus of the examination remains narrow. Practitioners working with MAHARAJ, DEVIKA S will find that this individual manages the entirety of the company's currently pending work. This structure allows for a very specific legal strategy tailored to the preferences of a single examiner.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MAHARAJ, DEVIKA S | 1 | 56.8% | +7.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18136285 | MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES FOR INFERRING TRANSIT TIMES AND MODES FOR SHIPMENTS | MAHARAJ, DEVIKA S | 31d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2123 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18136285 | MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES FOR INFERRING TRANSIT TIMES AND MODES FOR SHIPMENTS | MAHARAJ, DEVIKA S | 2123 | §101 | Final Rejection | 31d overdue | Pending | Apr 18, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial