Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Prologium Technology Co. Ltd. currently has 3 pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These cases are assigned to 3 distinct examiners, ensuring a variety of perspectives during the examination process. This arrangement requires the applicant to manage separate examiner relationships for their active filings.
Despite the number of examiners, the portfolio is concentrated within 2 distinct art units. SCHATZ, CHRISTOPHER T is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action, which is consistent with the distribution of the active cases across the examiner pool. The concentration in 2 distinct art units may allow for some technical consistency even with multiple examiners involved.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 2 (67%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (33%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCHATZ, CHRISTOPHER T | 1 | 62.6% | +27.3% |
| PATEL, VISHAL I | 1 | 78.5% | +9.8% |
| YUEN, JACKY | 1 | 35.2% | +50.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19050756 | LAMINATION MACHINE AND LAMINATION METHOD | SCHATZ, CHRISTOPHER T | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18082020 | LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERIES | YUEN, JACKY | 50d overdue |
| 19050756 | LAMINATION MACHINE AND LAMINATION METHOD | SCHATZ, CHRISTOPHER T | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1746 | 2 |
| 1735 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19050756 | LAMINATION MACHINE AND LAMINATION METHOD | SCHATZ, CHRISTOPHER T | 1746 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 11, 2025 |
| 18655922 | SLOT DIE COATING APPARATUS AND THE COATING METHOD THEREOF | PATEL, VISHAL I | 1746 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 06, 2024 |
| 18082020 | LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERIES | YUEN, JACKY | 1735 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 50d overdue | Pending | Dec 15, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialPrologium Technology Co. Ltd. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 3 examiners.
Christopher T Schatz has the most, with 1 of Prologium Technology Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
