Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Prometheos Inc. maintains a focused patent prosecution profile in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The company currently has 1 pending office action, which serves as the primary focus of its active intellectual property efforts. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, concentrating the review of the company's technology under a single point of authority.
The prosecution is conducted within 1 distinct art unit, suggesting a narrow technical scope for the pending application. COBANOGLU, DILEK B is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, responsible for 1 pending office action. Because this 1 action is the only one currently pending, the examiner's individual review style and technical understanding will directly shape the outcome of the company's current filing. This streamlined approach is efficient for protecting specific mechanical or systems innovations but places significant weight on a single examiner's decision.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| COBANOGLU, DILEK B | 1 | 33.3% | +27.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18632939 | CUSTOM MEDICAMENT INJECTION SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND INJECTORS | COBANOGLU, DILEK B | 31d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18632939 | CUSTOM MEDICAMENT INJECTION SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND INJECTORS | COBANOGLU, DILEK B | 31d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3687 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18632939 | CUSTOM MEDICAMENT INJECTION SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND INJECTORS | COBANOGLU, DILEK B | 3687 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 31d overdue | Pending | Apr 11, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial