Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Provectus Ip Pty Ltd. is currently managing 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, reflecting a focused approach to its current patent prosecution. The action is also housed within 1 distinct art unit, which suggests that the technical subject matter is being evaluated by a specific group of experts familiar with this particular field of innovation.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is ALMATRAHI, SAHAR FARIS, who is overseeing 1 busiest examiner pending action. As this is the only pending action for the company, the examiner's review will be the primary determinant of the portfolio's immediate progress. The combination of 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit for the 1 pending office action allows the company to concentrate its legal strategy on a set of technical and procedural requirements. This lack of diversification in the current workload means that the company's success in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area is currently tied to this individual examination process.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALMATRAHI, SAHAR FARIS | 1 | 30.3% | +56.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19218536 | CONTROL SYSTEM | ALMATRAHI, SAHAR FARIS | 12d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19218536 | CONTROL SYSTEM | ALMATRAHI, SAHAR FARIS | 12d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3643 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19218536 | CONTROL SYSTEM | ALMATRAHI, SAHAR FARIS | 3643 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | 12d | Pending | May 26, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial