Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Proventia OY

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Proventia OY currently has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This matter is being handled within 1 distinct art unit by 1 distinct examiner. STEPHEN J CASTELLANO is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, with 1 pending office action under their review.

The prosecution profile is limited to this 1 pending action, making the interaction with the assigned examiner the primary focus for the company. Success will depend on addressing the specific technical requirements of the pending matter within the 1 assigned art unit. Practitioners should analyze the examiner's past decisions to craft a more effective response. Because the portfolio involves only 1 distinct examiner, the company can dedicate its full attention to resolving this case in the medical devices field. This concentration of effort simplifies the management of current patent applications.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CASTELLANO, STEPHEN J 1 65.1% +35.7%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19183216 TRANSPORTABLE TEST ARRANGEMENT CASTELLANO, STEPHEN J —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19183216 TRANSPORTABLE TEST ARRANGEMENT CASTELLANO, STEPHEN J —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3733 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19183216 TRANSPORTABLE TEST ARRANGEMENT CASTELLANO, STEPHEN J 3733 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 18, 2025

Managing Proventia OY's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month