Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Proxymity Limited has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. The company's current USPTO activity is focused on this single pending application, which allows for a concentrated effort on this specific piece of intellectual property. This streamlined prosecution profile reduces the administrative complexity for the applicant.
FENSTERMACHER, JASON B is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, handling 1 pending office action. This examiner is responsible for the entirety of the company's current pending workload. The involvement of 1 distinct art unit indicates a specific technical review path within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field. With 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiner, the company's current patenting success depends on the interaction with this single point of contact at the USPTO, ensuring a focused and direct prosecution strategy.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| FENSTERMACHER, JASON B | 1 | 47.3% | +37.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19218176 | Electronic Proxy Voting Systems and Methods | FENSTERMACHER, JASON B | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19218176 | Electronic Proxy Voting Systems and Methods | FENSTERMACHER, JASON B | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3698 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19218176 | Electronic Proxy Voting Systems and Methods | FENSTERMACHER, JASON B | 3698 | §101§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | May 23, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialProxymity Limited has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Jason B Fenstermacher has the most, with 1 of Proxymity Limited's pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
