Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Prysmian S.p.A.

Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

5 pending office actions • 4 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 10 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Prysmian S.p.A. currently has 6 pending office actions in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. These actions involve 6 distinct examiners and 4 distinct art units. This distribution across 4 art units suggests that the company's semiconductor and optics work spans several specialized technical groups. With 6 pending office actions, the portfolio shows a consistent level of activity across multiple examiners, indicating a broad engagement with the USPTO's technical staff.

VELEZ, ROBERTO is the busiest examiner for the portfolio. This examiner is managing 1 pending office action. Because there are 6 distinct examiners for the portfolio, each matter is being prosecuted before a different examiner at the USPTO. This one-to-one ratio of examiners to actions across 4 art units means that the company must manage 6 separate prosecution tracks. This lack of examiner concentration requires a versatile strategy to address the varying perspectives involved in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics area.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
5
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only4 (80%)
§102 only1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
5
Semiconductors
100% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
VELEZ, ROBERTO 1 67.5% +21.6%
BEDTELYON, JOHN M 1 78.3% +14.1%
NGUYEN, CHAU N 1 68.0% +14.1%
LEPISTO, RYAN A 1 87.7% +7.8%
LUEBKE, RENEE S 1 42.1% +10.0%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18389622 OPTICAL CABLE FOR BLOWN INSTALLATION LEPISTO, RYAN A 14d

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17743532 FLAME-RETARDANT CABLE LUEBKE, RENEE S 331d overdue
18415132 Power cable with non-metallic tape armour NGUYEN, CHAU N 71d overdue
18944998 INSULATOR FOR A CABLE TERMINATION ASSEMBLY, TERMINATION ASSEMBLY FOR A POWER CABLE COMPRISING THE INSULATOR AND A CABLE TERMINATION SYSTEM VELEZ, ROBERTO —
18764649 Optical Cable Module BEDTELYON, JOHN M —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2874 2
2858 1
2841 1
2831 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18944998 INSULATOR FOR A CABLE TERMINATION ASSEMBLY, TERMINATION ASSEMBLY FOR A POWER CABLE COMPRISING THE INSULATOR AND A CABLE TERMINATION SYSTEM VELEZ, ROBERTO 2858 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 12, 2024
18764649 Optical Cable Module BEDTELYON, JOHN M 2874 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 05, 2024
18415132 Power cable with non-metallic tape armour NGUYEN, CHAU N 2841 §103 Non-Final OA 71d overdue Pending Jan 17, 2024
18389622 OPTICAL CABLE FOR BLOWN INSTALLATION LEPISTO, RYAN A 2874 §103 Non-Final OA 14d Pending Dec 19, 2023
17743532 FLAME-RETARDANT CABLE LUEBKE, RENEE S 2831 §103 Non-Final OA 331d overdue Pending May 13, 2022

Managing Prysmian S.p.A.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Prysmian S.p.A. have?

Prysmian S.p.A. has 5 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 4 art units and 5 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Prysmian S.p.A. applications?

Roberto Velez has the most, with 1 of Prysmian S.p.A.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Prysmian S.p.A.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics (USPTO Tech Center 2800), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month