Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Pulsenmore Ltd.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Pulsenmore Ltd. is active in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area with 3 pending office actions currently under review. These actions are handled by 3 distinct examiners, ensuring that each pending matter is evaluated by a different individual. This distribution suggests that the company is receiving a variety of feedback from the patent office across its current filings. The workload is concentrated within 2 distinct art units, which indicates some level of technical overlap or grouping in the types of medical devices being patented.

The busiest examiner for this portfolio is LY, TOMMY TAI, who is assigned 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Given the total of 3 pending office actions, the workload is spread, with no single examiner holding a majority of the cases. For a practitioner, this means that while the technical focus is limited to 2 distinct art units, the legal strategy must still account for the individual preferences of 3 different examiners. The presence of more examiners than art units suggests that even within a specific technical field, the company's applications are being split among different examining teams. This profile requires a balanced approach to handle the 3 pending office actions effectively.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MCDONALD, JAMES F 1 59.6% +43.2%
LY, TOMMY TAI 1 80.0% +23.6%
RAYMOND, KEITH MICHAEL 1 55.5% +21.5%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18868828 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DETECTING FLUID-RELATED CONDITIONS IN A PATIENT MCDONALD, JAMES F 16d
18685031 Medical Follicles Assessment Device LY, TOMMY TAI —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18868828 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DETECTING FLUID-RELATED CONDITIONS IN A PATIENT MCDONALD, JAMES F 16d
18685031 Medical Follicles Assessment Device LY, TOMMY TAI —
17920957 SYSTEM FOR ACQUIRING ULTRASOUND IMAGES OF INTERNAL BODY ORGANS RAYMOND, KEITH MICHAEL —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3797 2
3798 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18868828 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DETECTING FLUID-RELATED CONDITIONS IN A PATIENT MCDONALD, JAMES F 3797 §102§112 Final Rejection 16d Pending Nov 25, 2024
18685031 Medical Follicles Assessment Device LY, TOMMY TAI 3797 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 20, 2024
17920957 SYSTEM FOR ACQUIRING ULTRASOUND IMAGES OF INTERNAL BODY ORGANS RAYMOND, KEITH MICHAEL 3798 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 24, 2022

Managing Pulsenmore Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Pulsenmore Ltd. have?

Pulsenmore Ltd. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Pulsenmore Ltd. applications?

James F Mcdonald has the most, with 1 of Pulsenmore Ltd.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Pulsenmore Ltd.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month