Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Pulsenmore Ltd.

4 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
3
Medium (75%)
0
Easy (0%)
1
Unknown (25%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (50%)
§102 only1 (25%)
No statute on record1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MCDONALD, JAMES F 2 56.8% +41.8%
BYKHOVSKI, ALEXEI 1 75.7% +28.8%
SAKAMOTO, COLIN T 1 66.2% +25.5%

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17920948 SYSTEM FOR ACQUIRING ULTRASOUND IMAGES OF AN ORGAN OF A HUMAN BODY MCDONALD, JAMES F 35d overdue
19099920 IMPROVED MEDICAL FOLLICLES ASSESSMENT DEVICE SAKAMOTO, COLIN T 9d
18868828 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DETECTING FLUID-RELATED CONDITIONS IN A PATIENT MCDONALD, JAMES F 16d
19120046 MEDICAL FOLLICLES ASSESSMENT DEVICE WITH ERGONOMIC GRIP BYKHOVSKI, ALEXEI 40d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3798 2
3797 2

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19120046 MEDICAL FOLLICLES ASSESSMENT DEVICE WITH ERGONOMIC GRIP BYKHOVSKI, ALEXEI 3798 §103 Non-Final OA 40d Pending Apr 10, 2025
19099920 IMPROVED MEDICAL FOLLICLES ASSESSMENT DEVICE SAKAMOTO, COLIN T 3798 §103 Final Rejection 9d Pending Jan 30, 2025
18868828 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DETECTING FLUID-RELATED CONDITIONS IN A PATIENT MCDONALD, JAMES F 3797 §102 Non-Final OA 16d Pending Nov 25, 2024
17920948 SYSTEM FOR ACQUIRING ULTRASOUND IMAGES OF AN ORGAN OF A HUMAN BODY MCDONALD, JAMES F 3797 Other Non-Final OA 35d overdue Pending Oct 24, 2022

Managing Pulsenmore Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month