Technology areas: Computing & Software • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Punchh Inc. is currently managing 2 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These matters are distributed across 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, which indicates that the number of pending actions matches the number of examiners involved. This distribution suggests that each individual matter is being reviewed by a unique examiner in a unique art unit, rather than being clustered under a single point of contact at the USPTO.
The busiest examiner identified in the company's portfolio is EL-HAGE HASSAN, ABDALLAH A, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. This specific examiner handles 1 of the total 2 pending office actions currently active for the company. The involvement of 2 distinct art units within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector shows that the company's patent prosecution efforts are spread across different specialized examination groups. This variety in 2 art units and 2 examiners requires a prosecution strategy that can adapt to different technical perspectives and examination styles within the same broad technology area.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (50%) |
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| EL-HAGE HASSAN, ABDALLAH A | 1 | 43.2% | +40.5% |
| JORDAN, KIMBERLY L | 1 | 68.8% | +33.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18647916 | PREDICTIVE RFM SEGMENTATION | EL-HAGE HASSAN, ABDALLAH A | 5d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18647916 | PREDICTIVE RFM SEGMENTATION | EL-HAGE HASSAN, ABDALLAH A | 5d |
| 16743801 | Real Time User Matching Using Purchasing Behavior | JORDAN, KIMBERLY L | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3623 | 1 |
| 2194 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18647916 | PREDICTIVE RFM SEGMENTATION | EL-HAGE HASSAN, ABDALLAH A | 3623 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 5d | Pending | Apr 26, 2024 |
| 16743801 | Real Time User Matching Using Purchasing Behavior | JORDAN, KIMBERLY L | 2194 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 15, 2020 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialPunchh Inc. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
Abdallah A El-Hage Hassan has the most, with 1 of Punchh Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
