Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Punching Concepts Inc. currently faces 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is assigned to the distinct examiner, SINGH, KAVEL, who also serves as the busiest examiner for the portfolio. All current prosecution activity is localized within the distinct art unit.
This concentration in the art unit and under the distinct examiner indicates a highly focused prosecution effort. With only 1 pending office action, the company's current success at the USPTO depends entirely on the negotiations within this technical group. For the practitioner, this means there is no internal data to compare SINGH, KAVEL against other examiners in the same portfolio. The Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems focus is handled by a point of contact, which simplifies the management of the portfolio but also increases the impact of this individual examiner's tendencies. Because there is a pending office action, every development in this case is significant for the overall standing of the Punching Concepts Inc. portfolio.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §102 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SINGH, KAVEL | 1 | 83.7% | +14.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19033995 | TAKE-UP SYSTEM WITH INTEGRATED CONVEYOR TENSION-INDICATING MECHANISM | SINGH, KAVEL | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19033995 | TAKE-UP SYSTEM WITH INTEGRATED CONVEYOR TENSION-INDICATING MECHANISM | SINGH, KAVEL | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3651 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19033995 | TAKE-UP SYSTEM WITH INTEGRATED CONVEYOR TENSION-INDICATING MECHANISM | SINGH, KAVEL | 3651 | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 22, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial