Technology area: Networking & Security
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Pypestream Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Networking & Security technology area. This 1 pending office action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner. The prosecution is concentrated within 1 distinct art unit. This concentration within 1 distinct art unit indicates that the company's current patent efforts are focused in a specific administrative division. The presence of 1 distinct examiner shows that the company's legal strategy involves a single point of contact for its active matters.
PHILIP C LEE is the busiest examiner for the company. This examiner is responsible for 1 pending office action. The 1 pending office action assigned to this examiner is the active matter for the company within the Networking & Security sector. Having 1 pending office action with the busiest examiner shows that the workload is not distributed among multiple personnel. This structure allows the company to focus its resources on a specific examiner and art unit.
The management of 1 pending office action within 1 distinct art unit reflects the company's current engagement with the patent office. With 1 distinct examiner involved, the company can address the specific requirements of a specific official. This approach to prosecution ensures that the company's intellectual property is reviewed by a specific expert within the 1 distinct art unit. The focus on 1 distinct art unit and 1 distinct examiner defines the company's current patent profile.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LEE, PHILIP C | 1 | 77.3% | +20.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19425747 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR NAVIGATING NODES IN CHANNEL BASED CHATBOTS USING NATURAL LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDING | LEE, PHILIP C | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19425747 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR NAVIGATING NODES IN CHANNEL BASED CHATBOTS USING NATURAL LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDING | LEE, PHILIP C | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2454 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19425747 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR NAVIGATING NODES IN CHANNEL BASED CHATBOTS USING NATURAL LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDING | LEE, PHILIP C | 2454 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Dec 18, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialPypestream Inc. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Philip C Lee has the most, with 1 of Pypestream Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Networking & Security (USPTO Tech Center 2400), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
