Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Q Alpha Inc. currently manages 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This 1 action is distributed across 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, indicating a concentrated prosecution footprint. The focus of the portfolio is currently limited to a narrow administrative path within the patent office. This concentration suggests that the current prosecution strategy does not involve a diverse range of art units or examiner perspectives.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is MAH, CHUCK Y, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This 1 action matches the total of 1 pending office actions for the entire company. Practitioners should note that the workload is entirely centralized under this individual examiner. The alignment between the total 1 distinct examiners and the 1 pending office actions suggests that every active matter is being handled by a different individual, though in this case, only one such matter exists. This singular focus allows for a specific analysis of examiner behavior for the entirety of the pending portfolio.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MAH, CHUCK Y | 1 | 79.6% | +10.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18955397 | DOOR HOLDER ASSEMBLY | MAH, CHUCK Y | 30d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18955397 | DOOR HOLDER ASSEMBLY | MAH, CHUCK Y | 30d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3677 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18955397 | DOOR HOLDER ASSEMBLY | MAH, CHUCK Y | 3677 | §102§103§112 | Final Rejection | 30d overdue | Pending | Nov 21, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial