Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Qingzhou Pengcheng Packaging Machinery Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office action in its current portfolio. This 1 pending office action is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner, which indicates a focused and singular point of contact within the patent office. This structure simplifies the administrative burden of tracking multiple applications and examiner communications for the company's intellectual property.
BESLER, CHRISTOPHER JAMES is the busiest examiner for the company, holding 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This figure represents the total number of 1 pending office action for the entire portfolio. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner, the prosecution experience is uniform across the company's pending matters. The company's immediate focus is on resolving the 1 busiest examiner pending office action with BESLER, CHRISTOPHER JAMES.
There are no other examiners or pending actions to manage, which keeps the prosecution strategy simple. The progress of the portfolio is currently tied to the evaluation of this single examiner. Practitioners can focus their efforts on the specific preferences and history of BESLER, CHRISTOPHER JAMES, as there are no other active matters to balance. This focused environment allows for a direct and efficient response to the examiner's requirements.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BESLER, CHRISTOPHER JAMES | 1 | 68.4% | +41.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18913169 | CLAMPING MECHANISM AND CLAMPING APPARATUS | BESLER, CHRISTOPHER JAMES | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18913169 | CLAMPING MECHANISM AND CLAMPING APPARATUS | BESLER, CHRISTOPHER JAMES | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18913169 | CLAMPING MECHANISM AND CLAMPING APPARATUS | BESLER, CHRISTOPHER JAMES | — | §102§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 11, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial