Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Qualify Health Inc. currently has 2 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These 2 pending office actions are distributed between 2 distinct examiners, but they are both contained within 1 distinct art unit. This suggests that while the company's innovations are technically similar enough to be grouped in 1 distinct art unit, they are being reviewed by different individuals, which could lead to varying prosecution experiences.
The busiest examiner for Qualify Health Inc. is LEMIEUX, JESSICA, who is managing 1 busiest examiner pending action. Given that there are 2 pending office actions in total, the workload is split, with each of the 2 distinct examiners handling an action. For a practitioner, this means that the strategy in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area must account for the individual tendencies of both examiners. Even though the actions are in the same art unit, the presence of 2 distinct examiners means that a success with LEMIEUX, JESSICA does not guarantee a similar result for the other pending action. The focus remains on the specific requirements of the assigned art unit, which simplifies the technical scope of the prosecution.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LEMIEUX, JESSICA | 1 | 65.2% | +23.6% |
| RUHL, DENNIS WILLIAM | 1 | 26.3% | +23.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19036769 | Charitable Funding System and Method | RUHL, DENNIS WILLIAM | 17d overdue |
| 19037100 | Charitable Funding System and Method | LEMIEUX, JESSICA | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19036769 | Charitable Funding System and Method | RUHL, DENNIS WILLIAM | 17d overdue |
| 19037100 | Charitable Funding System and Method | LEMIEUX, JESSICA | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3626 | 2 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19037100 | Charitable Funding System and Method | LEMIEUX, JESSICA | 3626 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 25, 2025 |
| 19036769 | Charitable Funding System and Method | RUHL, DENNIS WILLIAM | 3626 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | 17d overdue | Pending | Jan 24, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial