Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Quandris Inc. currently manages 1 pending office action in the Computing & Software technology area. This matter is assigned to DIEDRA M MCQUITERY, who is the busiest examiner for the company. The prosecution is concentrated within 1 distinct art unit and involves only the distinct examiner.
The presence of the pending office action in the Computing & Software field suggests a targeted approach to intellectual property in the software sector. Because the company is working with the distinct examiner, the prosecution strategy does not need to account for varying examiner styles across the portfolio. DIEDRA M MCQUITERY is the sole point of contact for the company's current pending workload, making her review the primary factor in the company's immediate patent outcomes.
With 1 distinct art unit involved, the company's innovation is being evaluated against a specific set of software-related examination criteria. The pending office action represents the full extent of the company's current engagement with the patent office. This focused profile allows for a concentrated effort to overcome any rejections or objections raised in the Computing & Software technology area while working with the 1 distinct examiner.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| No statute on record | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCQUITERY, DIEDRA M | 1 | 73.1% | +28.7% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19172549 | ANALYZING A DATABASE BY REPRESENTING DATABASE RECORDS IN A PROJECTION SPACE INFLUENCED BY FORCES | MCQUITERY, DIEDRA M | 34d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2166 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19172549 | ANALYZING A DATABASE BY REPRESENTING DATABASE RECORDS IN A PROJECTION SPACE INFLUENCED BY FORCES | MCQUITERY, DIEDRA M | 2166 | Other | Non-Final OA | 34d | Pending | Apr 07, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial