Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Quantum Conductors Ltd. has 1 pending office action within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 examiner, NGUYEN, TRI V, and is situated within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a very focused and singular prosecution effort for the company at this time.
The busiest examiner, NGUYEN, TRI V, is responsible for the 1 pending office action, meaning the entire pending portfolio's progress is currently tied to this one individual. Because there is only 1 distinct art unit involved, the company does not have to navigate multiple sets of internal guidelines or administrative structures. This 1 to 1 ratio between the pending action and the examiner simplifies the prosecution strategy but also means there is no alternative examiner or art unit to provide a different perspective.
For a company in the Chemistry & Materials sector, having only 1 pending office action suggests a highly targeted patenting approach. Practitioners should focus on the specific examiner's history and the 1 distinct art unit's standards to effectively resolve the outstanding matter. This concentrated approach requires a deep understanding of the individual examiner's past decisions and the specific technical standards of the Chemistry & Materials field. Without other pending actions to distribute risk, the success of this 1 pending office action is paramount.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| NGUYEN, TRI V | 1 | 67.6% | +57.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19212087 | CONDUCTIVE ELEMENT | NGUYEN, TRI V | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19212087 | CONDUCTIVE ELEMENT | NGUYEN, TRI V | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1764 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19212087 | CONDUCTIVE ELEMENT | NGUYEN, TRI V | 1764 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 19, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialQuantum Conductors Ltd. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Tri V Nguyen has the most, with 1 of Quantum Conductors Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
