Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Quantum Information Security LLC

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Quantum Information Security LLC has 2 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners, with PATEL, NEHA identified as the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. Both actions are being prosecuted within 1 distinct art unit.

The concentration of 2 pending office actions in 1 distinct art unit suggests a narrow technical focus. However, the use of 2 distinct examiners means that different individuals are reviewing the company's work within that single art unit. PATEL, NEHA is responsible for 1 of the total pending actions. This structure requires the company to manage different examiner relationships even though the actions are housed in the same art unit.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
0
Medium (0%)
1
Easy (50%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Double-patenting only1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
1
Business / Other
50% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PATEL, NEHA 1 23.2% +21.0%
AVERY, BRIAN WILLIAM 1 59.3% +56.8%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19377563 Data Storage and Management and Methods of Thereof PATEL, NEHA —
19084027 Polymorphic Digital Security and Methods of Use Thereof AVERY, BRIAN WILLIAM —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19377563 Data Storage and Management and Methods of Thereof PATEL, NEHA —
19084027 Polymorphic Digital Security and Methods of Use Thereof AVERY, BRIAN WILLIAM —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3699 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19377563 Data Storage and Management and Methods of Thereof PATEL, NEHA 3699 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 03, 2025
19084027 Polymorphic Digital Security and Methods of Use Thereof AVERY, BRIAN WILLIAM — §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 19, 2025

Managing Quantum Information Security LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month