Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (25%) |
| §103 only | 1 (25%) |
| §112 only | 1 (25%) |
| No statute on record | 1 (25%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PEHLKE, CAROLYN A | 2 | 62.0% | +29.0% |
| KIM, KAITLYN EUNJI | 1 | 64.3% | +68.9% |
| LEWIS, CAMRYN BROOKE | 1 | 0.0% | +0.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18510090 | COMPUTER BASED CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING A CLASSIFICATION OF A LYMPHEDEMA INDUCED FLUORESCENCE PATTERN | LEWIS, CAMRYN BROOKE | 9d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18510123 | METHOD OF MEASURING A FLUORESCENCE SIGNAL AND OF DETERMINING A 3D REPRESENTATION, IMAGE CAPTURING AND PROCESSING DEVICE | PEHLKE, CAROLYN A | 4d overdue |
| 18510036 | METHOD OF MEASURING A FLUORESCENCE SIGNAL AND A VISIBLE LIGHT IMAGE, IMAGE CAPTURING AND PROCESSING DEVICE | PEHLKE, CAROLYN A | 14d |
| 19079695 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR VISUALIZATION OF FAINT FLUORESCENCE IN SURGERY, SOFTWARE PROGRAM | KIM, KAITLYN EUNJI | 56d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3799 | 2 |
| 3797 | 1 |
| 3683 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19079695 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR VISUALIZATION OF FAINT FLUORESCENCE IN SURGERY, SOFTWARE PROGRAM | KIM, KAITLYN EUNJI | 3797 | Other | Non-Final OA | 56d | Pending | Mar 14, 2025 |
| 18510123 | METHOD OF MEASURING A FLUORESCENCE SIGNAL AND OF DETERMINING A 3D REPRESENTATION, IMAGE CAPTURING AND PROCESSING DEVICE | PEHLKE, CAROLYN A | 3799 | §112 | Final Rejection | 4d overdue | Pending | Nov 15, 2023 |
| 18510036 | METHOD OF MEASURING A FLUORESCENCE SIGNAL AND A VISIBLE LIGHT IMAGE, IMAGE CAPTURING AND PROCESSING DEVICE | PEHLKE, CAROLYN A | 3799 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 14d | Pending | Nov 15, 2023 |
| 18510090 | COMPUTER BASED CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING A CLASSIFICATION OF A LYMPHEDEMA INDUCED FLUORESCENCE PATTERN | LEWIS, CAMRYN BROOKE | 3683 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 9d overdue | Pending | Nov 15, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial