Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Quio Technologies LLC

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Quio Technologies LLC currently manages 2 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This activity is distributed across 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, showing a broader administrative footprint. PAZ ESTEVEZ, GUILLERMO G is the busiest examiner, responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. The involvement of 2 distinct art units suggests that the company's medical device technology spans multiple technical classifications.

With 2 pending office actions, the company must coordinate responses across different examiners, though the workload is split with the busiest examiner handling 1 busiest examiner pending action. This distribution requires a prosecution strategy that accounts for the potentially different perspectives of 2 distinct examiners. Practitioners should be aware that the standards for allowance may vary between the 2 distinct art units, even within the same general technology area. The presence of multiple pending actions provides the company with more than 1 opportunity to secure patent rights.

The fact that PAZ ESTEVEZ, GUILLERMO G is the busiest examiner with 1 busiest examiner pending action indicates that the workload is not heavily concentrated. This distribution can be beneficial for the company, as it prevents the entire portfolio from being subject to the decisions of 1 examiner. Managing 2 pending office actions simultaneously requires careful attention to deadlines and a consistent technical narrative across the different filings in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering space.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (50%)
§103 only1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PAZ ESTEVEZ, GUILLERMO G 1 21.4% +5.0%
BALAJ, ANTHONY MICHAEL 1 30.6% +30.6%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
16637123 SELF-EXECUTING AGENTS FOR GATHERING HEALTH INFORMATION BETWEEN TRUSTED PARTIES BALAJ, ANTHONY MICHAEL 29d
17921300 ADD-ON FOR MEDICAMENT DELIVERY DEVICE WITH MAGNETIC LOCK PAZ ESTEVEZ, GUILLERMO G —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
16637123 SELF-EXECUTING AGENTS FOR GATHERING HEALTH INFORMATION BETWEEN TRUSTED PARTIES BALAJ, ANTHONY MICHAEL 29d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3783 1
3682 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
17921300 ADD-ON FOR MEDICAMENT DELIVERY DEVICE WITH MAGNETIC LOCK PAZ ESTEVEZ, GUILLERMO G 3783 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 25, 2022
16637123 SELF-EXECUTING AGENTS FOR GATHERING HEALTH INFORMATION BETWEEN TRUSTED PARTIES BALAJ, ANTHONY MICHAEL 3682 §101§112 Final Rejection 29d Pending Feb 06, 2020

Managing Quio Technologies LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month