Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Qwind LLC currently manages 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This single matter is being prosecuted in 1 distinct art unit, which suggests a highly specific technical focus for the company's current patent filings. Practitioners should note that the entire pending portfolio is concentrated within this one specialized area of the USPTO.
Richard W. Crandall is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently handling 1 pending office action. Because there is only 1 pending action in the entire company profile, Crandall's workload represents the totality of the company's current interactions with the patent office. The busiest examiner pending count of 1 confirms that no other matters are currently competing for this examiner's attention within the Qwind LLC account.
The presence of 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit for the 1 pending office action indicates a streamlined prosecution environment. There is no diversity in the examiner pool, as only 1 individual is involved in the current pending cases. This structure allows for a direct and singular point of contact, which may simplify the management of the company's intellectual property in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRANDALL, RICHARD W. | 1 | 30.2% | +33.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19332854 | PROMPT MONITORING SYSTEM FOR GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS | CRANDALL, RICHARD W. | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19332854 | PROMPT MONITORING SYSTEM FOR GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS | CRANDALL, RICHARD W. | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3619 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19332854 | PROMPT MONITORING SYSTEM FOR GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS | CRANDALL, RICHARD W. | 3619 | §101§102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 18, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial