Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

R Kikai Co. Ltd.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

R Kikai Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This single action is being processed by 1 distinct examiner and is situated within a single art unit. This concentration suggests a very specific technological focus for the company's current patent activity. The involvement of only one art unit simplifies the administrative tracking for this portion of the portfolio.

The busiest examiner for the company is KENNY, DANIEL J, who is managing the active matter. Because there is only one distinct examiner involved, the company's immediate prosecution timeline is subject to the specific review habits of this individual. Practitioners should prepare for the 1 pending office action by reviewing the examiner's past decisions in the mechanical systems field. This limited activity reflects a highly targeted approach to securing intellectual property rights.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
0
Medium (0%)
1
Easy (100%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§112 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KENNY, DANIEL J 1 61.8% +21.9%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18868865 CUMULATIVE DISPLACEMENT GAUGE AND VIBRATION CONTROL DAMPER KENNY, DANIEL J —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3633 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18868865 CUMULATIVE DISPLACEMENT GAUGE AND VIBRATION CONTROL DAMPER KENNY, DANIEL J 3633 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 25, 2024

Managing R Kikai Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month