Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
R2E Enterprises Ltd. maintains a focused patent portfolio within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. The company currently has 1 pending office action, which is being handled by 1 distinct examiner. This concentration suggests that the company's current prosecution efforts are focused on a specific technical advancement rather than a broad range of developments.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is MIKAILOFF, STEFAN, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner involved, the company's immediate patent outcomes are highly dependent on the individual discretion and examination patterns of this specific official. This arrangement allows for a direct channel of communication with the patent office.
The prosecution activity is located within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates that the current filings are being reviewed within a specialized division of the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics area. With 1 pending office action in 1 distinct art unit, the company can focus its resources on the specific procedural and substantive requirements of that unit to optimize its prosecution strategy.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MIKAILOFF, STEFAN | 1 | 42.7% | +29.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18771805 | KINETIC ENERGY HARVESTING SYSTEM | MIKAILOFF, STEFAN | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18771805 | KINETIC ENERGY HARVESTING SYSTEM | MIKAILOFF, STEFAN | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2834 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18771805 | KINETIC ENERGY HARVESTING SYSTEM | MIKAILOFF, STEFAN | 2834 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 12, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial