Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Radware Ltd.

Technology area: Networking & Security

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 11 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Radware Ltd. currently has 4 pending office actions in the Networking & Security technology area. These actions are distributed across 3 distinct art units, indicating technical variety within the networking field. The portfolio involves 4 distinct examiners, meaning each of the 4 pending actions is being reviewed by a different person. This distribution requires the company to manage 4 separate relationships with the patent office to resolve its current pending matters.

The busiest examiner for Radware Ltd. is LIN, AMIE CHINYU, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Because there are 4 distinct examiners for 4 pending actions, the workload is entirely decentralized. This lack of examiner overlap across the 3 distinct art units suggests that Radware Ltd. must navigate various examination styles for its 4 pending matters. Practitioners should note that the company's networking and security innovations are being evaluated by 4 different individuals, which may lead to varying prosecution outcomes. The involvement of 3 distinct art units further highlights the need for a flexible strategy that addresses the specific requirements of different technical divisions.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (50%)
2
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
4
Information Tech
100% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LIN, AMIE CHINYU 1 84.4% +30.9%
ALI, AFAQ 1 89.0% +10.3%
ABYANEH, ALI S 1 77.6% +56.1%
POUDEL, SAMIKSHYA NMN 1 53.6% +78.9%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18794620 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR METHOD FOR FINETUNING APPLICATION-LAYER SIGNATURES ALI, AFAQ 66d overdue
19003837 WEB APPLICATION AND APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACE (API) PROTECTION LIN, AMIE CHINYU —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18794620 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR METHOD FOR FINETUNING APPLICATION-LAYER SIGNATURES ALI, AFAQ 66d overdue
18471923 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTING DOCUMENT OBJECT MODEL CROSS-SITE SCRIPTING VULNERABILITY POUDEL, SAMIKSHYA NMN 28d
19003837 WEB APPLICATION AND APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACE (API) PROTECTION LIN, AMIE CHINYU —
18676904 SYSTEM AND METHOD OF VALIDATING A DOMAIN NAME SYSTEM QUERY ABYANEH, ALI S —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2436 2
2434 1
2437 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19003837 WEB APPLICATION AND APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACE (API) PROTECTION LIN, AMIE CHINYU 2436 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 27, 2024
18794620 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR METHOD FOR FINETUNING APPLICATION-LAYER SIGNATURES ALI, AFAQ 2434 §103§112Other Final Rejection 66d overdue Pending Aug 05, 2024
18676904 SYSTEM AND METHOD OF VALIDATING A DOMAIN NAME SYSTEM QUERY ABYANEH, ALI S 2437 §103 Final Rejection — Pending May 29, 2024
18471923 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTING DOCUMENT OBJECT MODEL CROSS-SITE SCRIPTING VULNERABILITY POUDEL, SAMIKSHYA NMN 2436 §103 Final Rejection 28d Pending Sep 21, 2023

Managing Radware Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Radware Ltd. have?

Radware Ltd. has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 4 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Radware Ltd. applications?

Amie Chinyu Lin has the most, with 1 of Radware Ltd.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Radware Ltd.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Networking & Security (USPTO Tech Center 2400), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month