Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Raft LLC currently manages a singular pending office action within the Computing & Software technology area. This action is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner, AGUILERA, TODD, and is classified within 1 distinct art unit. The data shows no other examiners or art units are currently active for this portfolio, indicating a highly concentrated prosecution environment.
AGUILERA, TODD is identified as the busiest examiner with 1 busiest examiner pending action, effectively centralizing the company's entire pending prosecution. This structure provides a very narrow focus for the company's legal strategy, as all current results depend on the interpretation of a single examiner. The concentration in 1 distinct art unit suggests that the technical subject matter is highly specific within the software domain. For practitioners, this means that the prosecution process is simplified into a single channel of communication. However, the lack of examiner diversity means there are no alternative perspectives or parallel tracks for the company's current intellectual property efforts, as every data point converges on 1 distinct examiner.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| AGUILERA, TODD | 1 | 57.6% | +57.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19375662 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OPERATING AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) WORKBENCH | AGUILERA, TODD | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19375662 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OPERATING AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) WORKBENCH | AGUILERA, TODD | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2192 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19375662 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OPERATING AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) WORKBENCH | AGUILERA, TODD | 2192 | §102§103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Oct 31, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial