Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Networking & Security
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Rair Technologies Inc. is managing 1 pending office action in the Networking & Security technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, AVERY, BRIAN WILLIAM, within 1 distinct art unit. AVERY, BRIAN WILLIAM is the busiest examiner with 1 pending action. All current prosecution for the company is concentrated in this single pending matter. This 1-examiner, 1-art unit structure provides a clear and focused path for the applicant's intellectual property goals.
The Networking & Security technology area represents the core of the company's current patent activity. Because there is only 1 pending office action, the role of AVERY, BRIAN WILLIAM is critical to the portfolio's success. The practitioner does not need to worry about inconsistent results across different examiners or art units, as the entire workload is localized. Instead, this ratio of 1 pending office action to 1 distinct examiner means that the practitioner's primary task is to satisfy the specific requirements of AVERY, BRIAN WILLIAM. This concentrated approach allows for a deep dive into the examiner's specific concerns, which is the most effective way to resolve the single pending matter in this 1 distinct art unit.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVERY, BRIAN WILLIAM | 1 | 59.3% | +56.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18870216 | A SYSTEM FOR MANAGING DISTRIBUTED DIGITAL RIGHTS | AVERY, BRIAN WILLIAM | 42d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2495 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18870216 | A SYSTEM FOR MANAGING DISTRIBUTED DIGITAL RIGHTS | AVERY, BRIAN WILLIAM | 2495 | §103 | Final Rejection | 42d | Pending | Nov 27, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial