Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Rapid Lab Inc. shows a streamlined prosecution profile within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The portfolio currently contains 1 pending office action. This activity is distributed across a single distinct examiner and a solitary distinct art unit, reflecting a singular point of focus in the current patenting efforts. Such a concentrated profile often indicates a company with a very specific technological niche or a company that is in the early stages of building its patent holdings.
TRINH T NGUYEN is identified as the busiest examiner, responsible for a single pending office action. This individual examiner handles the total volume of pending actions for the company. The concentration in a single art unit suggests that the current legal strategy is confined to a specific niche within the broader transportation and e-commerce sector. There are no other pending matters to provide a baseline for comparison within the company's internal prosecution history.
Because there is only a single distinct examiner and a single distinct art unit, the company's patent success currently hinges on a single relationship at the patent office. The busiest examiner pending count of 1 is identical to the total number of pending office actions, highlighting the absence of any secondary or tertiary prosecution threads. This focused approach simplifies the management of deadlines and responses but limits the breadth of the company's current intellectual property activity.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Double-patenting only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| NGUYEN, TRINH T | 1 | 69.0% | +27.4% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19395867 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING, TRACKING, & MONITORING BEHAVIORS OF LABORATORY ANIMALS WITHIN AN ANIMAL CAGE | NGUYEN, TRINH T | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3644 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19395867 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING, TRACKING, & MONITORING BEHAVIORS OF LABORATORY ANIMALS WITHIN AN ANIMAL CAGE | NGUYEN, TRINH T | 3644 | DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 20, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial