Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Raumedic AG currently has 1 pending office action within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This action is being handled by 1 distinct examiner, indicating a singular point of contact for the company's active patent prosecution. The data shows 1 distinct art unit is involved, which points to a concentrated technical focus for the current workload.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is DERUSSO, JOHN J, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. This single action constitutes the entire volume of 1 pending office action for the company. With 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, the prosecution environment is highly streamlined. Practitioners should note that the progress of the company's current patenting efforts is tied directly to this 1 examiner's review. This focused activity in the Chemistry & Materials sector allows for a very specific and targeted prosecution strategy without the complexity of multiple concurrent actions.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DERUSSO, JOHN J | 1 | 80.4% | +14.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18832813 | Method for connecting two silicone tube sections as well as pharmaceutical media transfer method with such a connection method and apparatus for performing the method | DERUSSO, JOHN J | 1d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18832813 | Method for connecting two silicone tube sections as well as pharmaceutical media transfer method with such a connection method and apparatus for performing the method | DERUSSO, JOHN J | 1d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1744 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18832813 | Method for connecting two silicone tube sections as well as pharmaceutical media transfer method with such a connection method and apparatus for performing the method | DERUSSO, JOHN J | 1744 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 1d overdue | Pending | Jul 24, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial