Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Rawwater Applied Technology Limited is currently managing 1 pending office action within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This prosecution activity is localized in 1 distinct art unit, indicating a specific focus for the current patent application. The matter is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner, which means the patent office engagement is limited to a single point of contact for this entity.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is BAREFORD, KATHERINE A, who is handling 1 pending office action. Since there is 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, the success of the prosecution will depend on the specific feedback and examination style of this individual. This focused approach in the Chemistry & Materials sector indicates that the current intellectual property efforts are centered on a specific innovation. The involvement of the examiner simplifies the prosecution strategy but places significant importance on the interactions with BAREFORD, KATHERINE A.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BAREFORD, KATHERINE A | 1 | 13.8% | +28.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18689221 | Method of Repairing a Defect and Device | BAREFORD, KATHERINE A | 16d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18689221 | Method of Repairing a Defect and Device | BAREFORD, KATHERINE A | 16d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1718 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18689221 | Method of Repairing a Defect and Device | BAREFORD, KATHERINE A | 1718 | §103 | Final Rejection | 16d overdue | Pending | Mar 05, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial