Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Rawwater Engineering Limited is currently handling 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This matter is assigned to a distinct examiner and a distinct art unit. The singular focus of the current prosecution suggests a specific technological development within this sector. This allows the company to concentrate its efforts on the technical standards and precedents relevant to the assigned art unit.
The busiest examiner, AHUJA, ANURADHA, holds 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This action constitutes the total pending workload for the company. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, the company can focus its efforts on the specific requirements and standards of this examiner to advance its patenting goals. Practitioners should note that the success of the company's current intellectual property strategy depends entirely on the resolution of this 1 pending office action. Effective communication with AHUJA, ANURADHA is essential for moving the application toward allowance.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| AHUJA, ANURADHA | 1 | 72.6% | +56.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18199094 | WELL SEALING MATERIAL AND METHOD OF PRODUCING A PLUG | AHUJA, ANURADHA | 19d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18199094 | WELL SEALING MATERIAL AND METHOD OF PRODUCING A PLUG | AHUJA, ANURADHA | 19d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3674 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18199094 | WELL SEALING MATERIAL AND METHOD OF PRODUCING A PLUG | AHUJA, ANURADHA | 3674 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | 19d overdue | Pending | May 18, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial