Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Raylase GmbH is currently prosecuting a patent portfolio in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. The portfolio features 1 pending office action, indicating a targeted approach to its current intellectual property development. This active matter is situated within 1 distinct art unit, which reflects a specific technical classification for the pending application.
The examination process is currently handled by 1 distinct examiner, centralizing the prosecution dialogue. TAVLYKAEV, ROBERT FUATOVICH is the busiest examiner for Raylase GmbH, holding 1 pending office action. As the sole examiner identified in the data, his review and procedural decisions will dictate the immediate progress of the company's patent applications in this technology sector.
The concentration of the workload into 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiner means that the prosecution strategy does not need to account for conflicting examiner styles. However, it also means there is no redundancy in the portfolio's current active pipeline. Practitioners should focus on the specific technical standards of the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics area as applied by TAVLYKAEV, ROBERT FUATOVICH to ensure a successful outcome for the single pending matter.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TAVLYKAEV, ROBERT FUATOVICH | 1 | 60.6% | +12.5% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18500423 | OPTICAL COUPLING DEVICE WITH DUST TRAP | TAVLYKAEV, ROBERT FUATOVICH | 29d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2896 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18500423 | OPTICAL COUPLING DEVICE WITH DUST TRAP | TAVLYKAEV, ROBERT FUATOVICH | 2896 | §103 | Final Rejection | 29d | Pending | Nov 02, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial