Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Rayzebio Inc.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Rayzebio Inc. has 3 pending office actions in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These actions are distributed among 3 distinct examiners across 2 distinct art units. This distribution indicates that while the company's technology is concentrated within a few specialized groups, it is being reviewed by several different individuals.

MOSHER, ERIC PARKER is the busiest examiner for the company, currently holding 1 pending office action. Since there are multiple distinct examiners for the pending actions, each examiner is managing a single case. This lack of examiner concentration means that the company must adapt its prosecution tactics to the specific preferences and habits of the different USPTO professionals involved.

The use of 2 distinct art units for the pending office actions indicates some concentration within the USPTO's organizational structure. However, the presence of multiple examiners means the company must still navigate different individual examination styles. Successfully managing the pending matters will require a flexible approach that accounts for the nuances of both the art units and the individual examiners involved.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (33%)
Double-patenting + other1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MOSHER, ERIC PARKER 1 100.0% +0.0%
DONOHUE, SEAN R 1 41.4% +21.0%
MEJIAS, SAMANTHA LEE 1 46.7% +40.0%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18434621 CONJUGATES COMPRISING COVALENT BINDERS FOR TARGETING INTRACELLULAR PROTEINS MOSHER, ERIC PARKER —
18431646 CONJUGATES COMPRISING COVALENT BINDERS FOR TARGETING INTRACELLULAR KRAS G12C PROTEINS MEJIAS, SAMANTHA LEE —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18431656 CONJUGATES COMPRISING COVALENT BINDERS FOR TARGETING INTRACELLULAR PROTEINS DONOHUE, SEAN R —
18431646 CONJUGATES COMPRISING COVALENT BINDERS FOR TARGETING INTRACELLULAR KRAS G12C PROTEINS MEJIAS, SAMANTHA LEE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1618 2
1612 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18434621 CONJUGATES COMPRISING COVALENT BINDERS FOR TARGETING INTRACELLULAR PROTEINS MOSHER, ERIC PARKER 1612 §101§102§103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 06, 2024
18431656 CONJUGATES COMPRISING COVALENT BINDERS FOR TARGETING INTRACELLULAR PROTEINS DONOHUE, SEAN R 1618 §102§103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 02, 2024
18431646 CONJUGATES COMPRISING COVALENT BINDERS FOR TARGETING INTRACELLULAR KRAS G12C PROTEINS MEJIAS, SAMANTHA LEE 1618 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 02, 2024

Managing Rayzebio Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Rayzebio Inc. have?

Rayzebio Inc. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Rayzebio Inc. applications?

Eric Parker Mosher has the most, with 1 of Rayzebio Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Rayzebio Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month