Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Communications • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
4 pending office actions • 2 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days
Really Right Stuff LLC currently manages 4 pending office actions within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. These 4 actions are distributed among 4 distinct examiners, meaning no two pending cases share the same examiner. The portfolio is active in 2 distinct art units, suggesting that the company's optics and circuit innovations are concentrated in a few technical groups. This concentration in 2 art units may provide some consistency in the technical review process.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is WUJCIAK, ALFRED J, who handles 1 busiest examiner pending action. With 4 pending office actions and 4 distinct examiners, the workload is perfectly spread out. Practitioners should be aware that they will be interacting with 4 different individuals across the 2 distinct art units. The data highlights a prosecution environment where technical focus is maintained across a diverse set of examiners. This structure requires practitioners to manage 4 distinct examiner relationships while navigating the specific requirements of the 2 distinct art units involved.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §102 only | 1 (25%) |
| §112 only | 1 (25%) |
| Double-patenting only | 1 (25%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (25%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WUJCIAK, ALFRED J | 1 | 74.9% | +11.4% |
| REISNER, NOAM S | 1 | 74.1% | -8.7% |
| PHAN, MINH Q | 1 | 75.8% | -4.7% |
| PASIEWICZ, DANIEL M | 1 | 77.0% | +12.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18889196 | EXTENDIBLE L-PLATE FOR CAMERA EQUIPMENT | REISNER, NOAM S | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19175225 | DUAL CLAMPING DEVICE | WUJCIAK, ALFRED J | — |
| 18794319 | GIMBAL BASED CAMERA SUPPORT | PASIEWICZ, DANIEL M | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2852 | 2 |
| 2699 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19175225 | DUAL CLAMPING DEVICE | WUJCIAK, ALFRED J | — | DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 10, 2025 |
| 18889196 | EXTENDIBLE L-PLATE FOR CAMERA EQUIPMENT | REISNER, NOAM S | 2852 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Sep 18, 2024 |
| 18799437 | ADJUSTABLE L-BRACKET | PHAN, MINH Q | 2852 | §112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Aug 09, 2024 |
| 18794319 | GIMBAL BASED CAMERA SUPPORT | PASIEWICZ, DANIEL M | 2699 | §102Other | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Aug 05, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial