Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Rec'S Innovation Co. Ltd.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Rec'S Innovation Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This matter is assigned to AKIBA KANELLE ROBINSON, who is the busiest examiner for the portfolio. The prosecution is confined to 1 distinct art unit and a distinct examiner. This data indicates a focused current engagement with the patent office.

Because the portfolio consists of only 1 pending office action, the company's immediate patent strategy is highly dependent on the interaction with AKIBA KANELLE ROBINSON. The placement of this matter within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector suggests a targeted innovation. Practitioners should focus on the specific procedural history of the single art unit involved to ensure the technical merits are clearly communicated and to anticipate the progression of this pending action.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ROBINSON, AKIBA KANELLE 1 38.2% +24.6%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19343946 VIRTUAL POWER PLANT SYSTEM BASED ON SELF-DEMAND RESPONSE ROBINSON, AKIBA KANELLE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3626 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19343946 VIRTUAL POWER PLANT SYSTEM BASED ON SELF-DEMAND RESPONSE ROBINSON, AKIBA KANELLE 3626 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 29, 2025

Managing Rec'S Innovation Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month