Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026

Recursion Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

9 pending office actions • 8 art units • 9 examiners • 0 of 9 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 18 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Recursion Pharmaceuticals Inc. has 9 pending office actions in Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals. The matters involve 9 distinct examiners and 8 distinct art units. Examiner assignments are fully dispersed, while one art unit contains more than one pending action.

SIOZOPOULOS, CONSTANTINE B is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending action. Counsel should prioritize independent matter review and maintain an art-unit reference for the small amount of technical overlap shown by the data.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

9
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

7
Hard (78%)
2
Medium (22%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (11%)
§101 + other4 (44%)
§103 only1 (11%)
§102 only1 (11%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (22%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

5
Life Sciences
56% of docket
1
Information Tech
11% of docket
1
Communications
11% of docket
1
Semiconductors
11% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
11% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

90 h
Manual time on pending OAs
18 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
31 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SIOZOPOULOS, CONSTANTINE B 1 57.5% +39.6%
TO, BAOQUOC N 1 89.9% +7.9%
NGUYEN, LEON VIET Q 1 85.2% +10.2%
ROSSI, VY BUI 1 29.5% +36.4%
PARK, HYUN D 1 41.8% +22.5%
ISMAIL, REHANA 1 76.2% +34.8%
VASSELL, MEREDITH ABBOTT 1 29.9% +45.8%
BAILEY, STEVEN WILLIAM 1 31.6% +15.2%
ARIETI, RUTH SOPHIA 1 46.2% +71.4%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18813537 UTILIZING MASKED AUTOENCODER GENERATIVE MODELS TO EXTRACT MICROSCOPY REPRESENTATION AUTOENCODER EMBEDDINGS NGUYEN, LEON VIET Q —

Hard Cases (7)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17101545 HIGH THROUGHPUT GENE EDITING SYSTEM AND METHOD ARIETI, RUTH SOPHIA 60d overdue
19167738 COMPUTATIONAL DRUG TARGET SELECTION SIOZOPOULOS, CONSTANTINE B —
19270223 UTILIZING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS TO SYNTHESIZE PERTURBATION DATA TO GENERATE PERTURBATION HEATMAP GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES TO, BAOQUOC N —
18753906 DETERMINING PHENOMIC RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN COMPOUNDS AND CELL PERTURBATIONS UTILIZING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS ROSSI, VY BUI —
18663991 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR HIGH THROUGHPUT COMPOUND LIBRARY CREATION PARK, HYUN D —
18231219 Drug Optimization by Active Learning VASSELL, MEREDITH ABBOTT —
18138705 Computational Drug Target Selection BAILEY, STEVEN WILLIAM —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17101545 HIGH THROUGHPUT GENE EDITING SYSTEM AND METHOD ARIETI, RUTH SOPHIA 60d overdue
19167738 COMPUTATIONAL DRUG TARGET SELECTION SIOZOPOULOS, CONSTANTINE B —
18813537 UTILIZING MASKED AUTOENCODER GENERATIVE MODELS TO EXTRACT MICROSCOPY REPRESENTATION AUTOENCODER EMBEDDINGS NGUYEN, LEON VIET Q —
18753906 DETERMINING PHENOMIC RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN COMPOUNDS AND CELL PERTURBATIONS UTILIZING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS ROSSI, VY BUI —
18663991 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR HIGH THROUGHPUT COMPOUND LIBRARY CREATION PARK, HYUN D —
18234341 Heterocycle RMB39 Modulators ISMAIL, REHANA —
18231219 Drug Optimization by Active Learning VASSELL, MEREDITH ABBOTT —
18138705 Computational Drug Target Selection BAILEY, STEVEN WILLIAM —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1687 2
3686 1
2154 1
2663 1
1685 1
2857 1
1625 1
1635 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19167738 COMPUTATIONAL DRUG TARGET SELECTION SIOZOPOULOS, CONSTANTINE B 3686 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 22, 2025
19270223 UTILIZING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS TO SYNTHESIZE PERTURBATION DATA TO GENERATE PERTURBATION HEATMAP GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES TO, BAOQUOC N 2154 §101§103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 15, 2025
18813537 UTILIZING MASKED AUTOENCODER GENERATIVE MODELS TO EXTRACT MICROSCOPY REPRESENTATION AUTOENCODER EMBEDDINGS NGUYEN, LEON VIET Q 2663 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 23, 2024
18753906 DETERMINING PHENOMIC RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN COMPOUNDS AND CELL PERTURBATIONS UTILIZING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS ROSSI, VY BUI 1685 §101§102DP Final Rejection — Pending Jun 25, 2024
18663991 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR HIGH THROUGHPUT COMPOUND LIBRARY CREATION PARK, HYUN D 2857 §103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending May 14, 2024
18234341 Heterocycle RMB39 Modulators ISMAIL, REHANA 1625 §102 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 15, 2023
18231219 Drug Optimization by Active Learning VASSELL, MEREDITH ABBOTT 1687 §101§103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 07, 2023
18138705 Computational Drug Target Selection BAILEY, STEVEN WILLIAM 1687 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 24, 2023
17101545 HIGH THROUGHPUT GENE EDITING SYSTEM AND METHOD ARIETI, RUTH SOPHIA 1635 §103§112 Non-Final OA 60d overdue Pending Nov 23, 2020

Managing Recursion Pharmaceuticals Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Recursion Pharmaceuticals Inc. have?

Recursion Pharmaceuticals Inc. has 9 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 8 art units and 9 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Recursion Pharmaceuticals Inc. applications?

Constantine B Siozopoulos has the most, with 1 of Recursion Pharmaceuticals Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Recursion Pharmaceuticals Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month