Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Red Avenue New Materials Group Co. Ltd. is active in the Chemistry & Materials technology area with a portfolio that currently includes 1 pending office action. This 1 pending office action represents the full extent of the company's current prosecution activity. The examiner assigned to this case is DESTEFANO, AUDRA JEAN, who is the busiest examiner for the portfolio. Because DESTEFANO, AUDRA JEAN is handling 1 busiest examiner pending action, the company's immediate patenting goals are focused on this individual interaction.
The data indicates a narrow prosecution footprint, featuring 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This suggests that the company's material science innovations are specialized and categorized within a single technical domain. Operating within 1 distinct art unit implies that the company is subject to the specific examination culture and timelines of that particular group. The use of 1 distinct examiner simplifies the management of the portfolio, as it eliminates the need to coordinate across different examiner preferences. This 1 pending office action is the sole focus of the company's current efforts to expand its intellectual property holdings in the Chemistry & Materials sector.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DESTEFANO, AUDRA JEAN | 1 | 56.4% | +61.2% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17866424 | Butenediol-based Polyester Elastomer and Method for Preparing Same | DESTEFANO, AUDRA JEAN | 34d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1766 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17866424 | Butenediol-based Polyester Elastomer and Method for Preparing Same | DESTEFANO, AUDRA JEAN | 1766 | §103 | Final Rejection | 34d | Pending | Jul 15, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial