Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Redapple Digital Health Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This matter is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner within 1 distinct art unit. This concentration suggests that the company's current patent activity is focused on a specific digital health or e-commerce solution. The limited number of pending actions indicates a low level of current friction or a small number of active applications.
COVINGTON, AMANDA R is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, handling 1 pending office action. This single examiner is responsible for the company's entire pending workload. Because there is only 1 pending office action, the company's immediate prosecution strategy is tied to the specific feedback of this examiner. The involvement of only 1 distinct art unit means that the company is not currently navigating multiple technical classifications. Practitioners should consider the specific practices of this art unit when responding to the pending action. The simplicity of this profile, with only 1 active matter, highlights a very targeted approach to patent acquisition.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| COVINGTON, AMANDA R | 1 | 21.8% | +28.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18200797 | HEALTHCARE PROFILE CARD INDEXING SYSTEM AND APPARATUS | COVINGTON, AMANDA R | 9d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18200797 | HEALTHCARE PROFILE CARD INDEXING SYSTEM AND APPARATUS | COVINGTON, AMANDA R | 9d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3686 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18200797 | HEALTHCARE PROFILE CARD INDEXING SYSTEM AND APPARATUS | COVINGTON, AMANDA R | 3686 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 9d | Pending | May 23, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial