Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Redd Point BV has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This workload is distributed across 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, showing a focus for the company's current patent office interactions. Such a streamlined profile indicates that the company is not currently managing a high volume of simultaneous disputes or diverse technological inquiries across different patent office divisions. This allows for a more targeted allocation of resources toward this active matter.
The busiest examiner identified in the data is ARYANPOUR, MITRA, who accounts for 1 busiest examiner pending action. This examiner is responsible for the only active office action in the portfolio, making their specific examination style the primary factor for the company's current progress in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering. The absence of other pending matters suggests that the company can dedicate its full attention to resolving the issues raised by this 1 examiner.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARYANPOUR, MITRA | 1 | 56.2% | +33.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18288493 | DEVICE FOR DETERMINING A BALL IMPACT IN THE CORNER BETWEEN A WALL AND THE GROUND | ARYANPOUR, MITRA | 51d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18288493 | DEVICE FOR DETERMINING A BALL IMPACT IN THE CORNER BETWEEN A WALL AND THE GROUND | ARYANPOUR, MITRA | 51d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3711 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18288493 | DEVICE FOR DETERMINING A BALL IMPACT IN THE CORNER BETWEEN A WALL AND THE GROUND | ARYANPOUR, MITRA | 3711 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | 51d overdue | Pending | Oct 26, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial