Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Regard Technologies Inc. manages 2 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are overseen by a distinct examiner in 1 distinct art unit. EMILY HUYNH is the busiest examiner, responsible for 2 pending office actions. The portfolio's current prosecution is centralized under one examiner, which simplifies the coordination of the company's patent strategy.
Having 1 distinct examiner for the 2 pending office actions means that HUYNH will be familiar with the company's technology across its active filings. The concentration in the unique art unit further suggests that the company's innovations are focused on a specific technical area. Because HUYNH is the busiest examiner and handles all current actions, her individual examination style is the most critical factor for the company's patent outcomes. Practitioners should ensure that the responses for the 2 pending actions are harmonized, as they will be reviewed by the unique individual within the unique art unit framework.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HUYNH, EMILY | 2 | 21.9% | +43.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18981206 | METHOD FOR REAL-TIME RETREIVAL AND INTERPRETATION OF PATIENT DATA TO SUPPORT HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS DURING PATIENT ENCOUNTERS | HUYNH, EMILY | 15d |
| 18756869 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR REAL-TIME AUGMENTATION OF PROVIDER PROGRESS NOTES AND SELECTIVE RECOMMENDATION OF PATIENT DIAGNOSES TO A PROVIDER | HUYNH, EMILY | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18981206 | METHOD FOR REAL-TIME RETREIVAL AND INTERPRETATION OF PATIENT DATA TO SUPPORT HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS DURING PATIENT ENCOUNTERS | HUYNH, EMILY | 15d |
| 18756869 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR REAL-TIME AUGMENTATION OF PROVIDER PROGRESS NOTES AND SELECTIVE RECOMMENDATION OF PATIENT DIAGNOSES TO A PROVIDER | HUYNH, EMILY | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3683 | 2 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18981206 | METHOD FOR REAL-TIME RETREIVAL AND INTERPRETATION OF PATIENT DATA TO SUPPORT HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS DURING PATIENT ENCOUNTERS | HUYNH, EMILY | 3683 | §101 | Final Rejection | 15d | Pending | Dec 13, 2024 |
| 18756869 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR REAL-TIME AUGMENTATION OF PROVIDER PROGRESS NOTES AND SELECTIVE RECOMMENDATION OF PATIENT DIAGNOSES TO A PROVIDER | HUYNH, EMILY | 3683 | §101 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jun 27, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial