Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Regard Technologies Inc.

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (50%)
§103 only1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HUYNH, EMILY 1 19.5% +40.1%
HAMILTON, MATTHEW L 1 53.6% +61.9%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18981206 METHOD FOR REAL-TIME RETREIVAL AND INTERPRETATION OF PATIENT DATA TO SUPPORT HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS DURING PATIENT ENCOUNTERS HUYNH, EMILY 15d

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18981206 METHOD FOR REAL-TIME RETREIVAL AND INTERPRETATION OF PATIENT DATA TO SUPPORT HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS DURING PATIENT ENCOUNTERS HUYNH, EMILY 15d
18756916 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR REAL-TIME AUGMENTATION OF PROVIDER PROGRESS NOTES AND SELECTIVE RECOMMENDATION OF PATIENT DIAGNOSES TO A PROVIDER HAMILTON, MATTHEW L 83d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3683 1
3681 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18981206 METHOD FOR REAL-TIME RETREIVAL AND INTERPRETATION OF PATIENT DATA TO SUPPORT HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS DURING PATIENT ENCOUNTERS HUYNH, EMILY 3683 §101 Non-Final OA 15d Pending Dec 13, 2024
18756916 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR REAL-TIME AUGMENTATION OF PROVIDER PROGRESS NOTES AND SELECTIVE RECOMMENDATION OF PATIENT DIAGNOSES TO A PROVIDER HAMILTON, MATTHEW L 3681 §103 Non-Final OA 83d Pending Jun 27, 2024

Managing Regard Technologies Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month