Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Regen Theranostics Inc.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Regen Theranostics Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. The portfolio's active prosecution is handled by 1 distinct examiner and is situated within 1 distinct art unit. This distribution shows a narrow administrative footprint for the company's current filings. For patent practitioners, this indicates that the company's immediate legal strategy is focused on a single point of contact within the patent office, which simplifies communication but increases the impact of that one examiner's specific preferences.

The busiest examiner, NOBLE, MARCIA STEPHENS, is responsible for 1 pending office action. The presence of 1 distinct art unit indicates that the biotechnology and pharmaceutical work is currently focused in one specialized regulatory group. This concentration suggests that the practitioner should tailor their arguments to the specific standards of this art unit, as there is no diversification across different technical groups at this time. Navigating this single-examiner environment requires a precise understanding of the examiner's previous rulings in the biotechnology sector.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
0
Medium (0%)
1
Easy (100%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§112 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
NOBLE, MARCIA STEPHENS 1 67.0% +39.9%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18368240 METHOD OF MANUFACTURING AUTOLOGOUS CARDIAC LINEAGE CELLS NOBLE, MARCIA STEPHENS —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1632 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18368240 METHOD OF MANUFACTURING AUTOLOGOUS CARDIAC LINEAGE CELLS NOBLE, MARCIA STEPHENS 1632 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 14, 2023

Managing Regen Theranostics Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month