Technology area: Computing & Software
6 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days
Relativity Oda LLC has 8 pending office actions in Computing & Software. The matters span 5 examiners and 5 art units, indicating that the docket is dispersed across distinct examination settings rather than concentrated in one technical unit.
MOSER, BRUCE M. is the busiest examiner, with 3 pending matters. That assignment represents the clearest examiner-specific concentration in the available profile, while the remaining actions require coordination across other examiner and art-unit combinations.
The distribution supports a portfolio-level review of recurring claim themes and response positions, but it does not eliminate the need for matter-specific analysis. Counsel should track how claim scope and prior-art arguments perform across the separate art units.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (17%) |
| §101 + other | 3 (50%) |
| §103 only | 1 (17%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (17%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MOSER, BRUCE M | 3 | 84.2% | +20.1% |
| HOFFMAN, BRANDON S | 1 | 90.5% | +6.4% |
| SITTNER, MATTHEW T | 1 | 57.9% | +56.1% |
| TSAI, SHENG JEN | 1 | 70.5% | +13.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19052157 | Systems and Methods for Prompt Tuning Based on Document Classification | MOSER, BRUCE M | 74d overdue |
| 19052186 | Systems and Methods for Iteratively Updating Classification Prompts | MOSER, BRUCE M | 66d overdue |
| 19052197 | Systems and Methods for Prompt Self-Optimization | MOSER, BRUCE M | 42d overdue |
| 19052162 | Systems and Methods for Classification Explainability | HOFFMAN, BRANDON S | — |
| 18595261 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DETERMINING STOPPING POINT | SITTNER, MATTHEW T | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19052157 | Systems and Methods for Prompt Tuning Based on Document Classification | MOSER, BRUCE M | 74d overdue |
| 19052186 | Systems and Methods for Iteratively Updating Classification Prompts | MOSER, BRUCE M | 66d overdue |
| 19052197 | Systems and Methods for Prompt Self-Optimization | MOSER, BRUCE M | 42d overdue |
| 18595261 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DETERMINING STOPPING POINT | SITTNER, MATTHEW T | — |
| 17867347 | QUEUE OPTIMIZATION VIA PREDICITIVE CACHING IN CLOUD COMPUTING | TSAI, SHENG JEN | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2154 | 3 |
| 2433 | 1 |
| 3629 | 1 |
| 2139 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19052197 | Systems and Methods for Prompt Self-Optimization | MOSER, BRUCE M | 2154 | §101 | Final Rejection | 42d overdue | Pending | Feb 12, 2025 |
| 19052162 | Systems and Methods for Classification Explainability | HOFFMAN, BRANDON S | 2433 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 12, 2025 |
| 19052157 | Systems and Methods for Prompt Tuning Based on Document Classification | MOSER, BRUCE M | 2154 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 74d overdue | Pending | Feb 12, 2025 |
| 19052186 | Systems and Methods for Iteratively Updating Classification Prompts | MOSER, BRUCE M | 2154 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 66d overdue | Pending | Feb 12, 2025 |
| 18595261 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DETERMINING STOPPING POINT | SITTNER, MATTHEW T | 3629 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 04, 2024 |
| 17867347 | QUEUE OPTIMIZATION VIA PREDICITIVE CACHING IN CLOUD COMPUTING | TSAI, SHENG JEN | 2139 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jul 18, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialRelativity Oda LLC has 6 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 4 art units and 4 examiners.
Bruce M Moser has the most, with 3 of Relativity Oda LLC's pending office actions.
Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
