Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Relativity Oda LLC

7 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 7 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

5
Overdue
1
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (5)Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (14%)
6
Medium (86%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (14%)
§103 only6 (86%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
6
Information Tech
86% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
14% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MOSER, BRUCE M 3 84.3% +20.1%
ALLEN, BRITTANY N 2 41.8% +37.6%
VETTER, DANIEL 1 19.6% +9.1%
FAAL, BABOUCARR 1 80.3% +14.7%

Quick Wins (4)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19052157 Systems and Methods for Prompt Tuning Based on Document Classification MOSER, BRUCE M 74d overdue
19052186 Systems and Methods for Iteratively Updating Classification Prompts MOSER, BRUCE M 66d overdue
19052197 Systems and Methods for Prompt Self-Optimization MOSER, BRUCE M 42d overdue
18240778 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PREDICTIVE CACHE MANAGEMENT BASED UPON SYSTEM WORKFLOW FAAL, BABOUCARR 17d overdue

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18595290 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DETERMINING STOPPING POINT VETTER, DANIEL 27d

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19052157 Systems and Methods for Prompt Tuning Based on Document Classification MOSER, BRUCE M 74d overdue
19052186 Systems and Methods for Iteratively Updating Classification Prompts MOSER, BRUCE M 66d overdue
19052197 Systems and Methods for Prompt Self-Optimization MOSER, BRUCE M 42d overdue
18240778 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PREDICTIVE CACHE MANAGEMENT BASED UPON SYSTEM WORKFLOW FAAL, BABOUCARR 17d overdue
19052192 Systems and Methods for Generating Initial Prompt Criteria ALLEN, BRITTANY N 5d overdue
19052200 Systems and Methods for Updating a Validation Sample ALLEN, BRITTANY N 6d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2154 3
2169 2
3628 1
2138 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19052157 Systems and Methods for Prompt Tuning Based on Document Classification MOSER, BRUCE M 2154 §103 Non-Final OA 74d overdue Pending Feb 12, 2025
19052192 Systems and Methods for Generating Initial Prompt Criteria ALLEN, BRITTANY N 2169 §103 Non-Final OA 5d overdue Pending Feb 12, 2025
19052186 Systems and Methods for Iteratively Updating Classification Prompts MOSER, BRUCE M 2154 §103 Non-Final OA 66d overdue Pending Feb 12, 2025
19052200 Systems and Methods for Updating a Validation Sample ALLEN, BRITTANY N 2169 §103 Non-Final OA 6d Pending Feb 12, 2025
19052197 Systems and Methods for Prompt Self-Optimization MOSER, BRUCE M 2154 §103 Non-Final OA 42d overdue Pending Feb 12, 2025
18595290 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DETERMINING STOPPING POINT VETTER, DANIEL 3628 §101 Final Rejection 27d Pending Mar 04, 2024
18240778 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PREDICTIVE CACHE MANAGEMENT BASED UPON SYSTEM WORKFLOW FAAL, BABOUCARR 2138 §103 Non-Final OA 17d overdue Pending Aug 31, 2023

Managing Relativity Oda LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month