Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
10 pending office actions • 5 art units • 9 examiners • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 7 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (10%) |
| §101 + other | 4 (40%) |
| §103 only | 2 (20%) |
| §102 only | 1 (10%) |
| Double-patenting only | 1 (10%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (10%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALLEN, BRITTANY N | 2 | 42.0% | +37.7% |
| ALGIBHAH, MAHER N | 1 | 87.8% | +19.4% |
| WOO, ISAAC M | 1 | 91.4% | +6.4% |
| HOFFMAN, BRANDON S | 1 | 90.6% | +6.2% |
| LYONS, ANDREW M | 1 | 73.6% | +15.8% |
| BEJCEK II, ROBERT H | 1 | 63.5% | +22.7% |
| SITTNER, MATTHEW T | 1 | 57.9% | +56.1% |
| FAAL, BABOUCARR | 1 | 80.5% | +14.5% |
| ALAM, HOSAIN T | 1 | 62.5% | +13.9% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18240778 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PREDICTIVE CACHE MANAGEMENT BASED UPON SYSTEM WORKFLOW | FAAL, BABOUCARR | 17d overdue |
| 19267256 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION OF LEGAL ENTITIES | ALGIBHAH, MAHER N | — |
| 19234033 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MAINTAINING A RANDOM SAMPLE OF DOCUMENTS | WOO, ISAAC M | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19052192 | Systems and Methods for Generating Initial Prompt Criteria | ALLEN, BRITTANY N | 5d overdue |
| 19052200 | Systems and Methods for Updating a Validation Sample | ALLEN, BRITTANY N | 6d |
| 19052162 | Systems and Methods for Classification Explainability | HOFFMAN, BRANDON S | — |
| 18748814 | Systems and Methods for Evaluating Models Using Candidate Job Analysis | LYONS, ANDREW M | — |
| 18640301 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USING SYNTHETIC DATA TO TRAIN MACHINE LEARNING MODELS | BEJCEK II, ROBERT H | — |
| 18595261 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DETERMINING STOPPING POINT | SITTNER, MATTHEW T | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18240778 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PREDICTIVE CACHE MANAGEMENT BASED UPON SYSTEM WORKFLOW | FAAL, BABOUCARR | 17d overdue |
| 19052192 | Systems and Methods for Generating Initial Prompt Criteria | ALLEN, BRITTANY N | 5d overdue |
| 19052200 | Systems and Methods for Updating a Validation Sample | ALLEN, BRITTANY N | 6d |
| 19267256 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION OF LEGAL ENTITIES | ALGIBHAH, MAHER N | — |
| 18748814 | Systems and Methods for Evaluating Models Using Candidate Job Analysis | LYONS, ANDREW M | — |
| 18640301 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USING SYNTHETIC DATA TO TRAIN MACHINE LEARNING MODELS | BEJCEK II, ROBERT H | — |
| 18595261 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DETERMINING STOPPING POINT | SITTNER, MATTHEW T | — |
| 18131820 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SELF-TRAINING A COMMUNICATION DOCUMENT PARSER | ALAM, HOSAIN T | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2169 | 2 |
| 2191 | 1 |
| 3629 | 1 |
| 2138 | 1 |
| 2100 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19267256 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION OF LEGAL ENTITIES | ALGIBHAH, MAHER N | — | DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 11, 2025 |
| 19234033 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MAINTAINING A RANDOM SAMPLE OF DOCUMENTS | WOO, ISAAC M | — | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 10, 2025 |
| 19052200 | Systems and Methods for Updating a Validation Sample | ALLEN, BRITTANY N | 2169 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 6d | Pending | Feb 12, 2025 |
| 19052192 | Systems and Methods for Generating Initial Prompt Criteria | ALLEN, BRITTANY N | 2169 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 5d overdue | Pending | Feb 12, 2025 |
| 19052162 | Systems and Methods for Classification Explainability | HOFFMAN, BRANDON S | — | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 12, 2025 |
| 18748814 | Systems and Methods for Evaluating Models Using Candidate Job Analysis | LYONS, ANDREW M | 2191 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 20, 2024 |
| 18640301 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USING SYNTHETIC DATA TO TRAIN MACHINE LEARNING MODELS | BEJCEK II, ROBERT H | — | §101§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 19, 2024 |
| 18595261 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DETERMINING STOPPING POINT | SITTNER, MATTHEW T | 3629 | §101 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 04, 2024 |
| 18240778 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PREDICTIVE CACHE MANAGEMENT BASED UPON SYSTEM WORKFLOW | FAAL, BABOUCARR | 2138 | §103 | Final Rejection | 17d overdue | Pending | Aug 31, 2023 |
| 18131820 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SELF-TRAINING A COMMUNICATION DOCUMENT PARSER | ALAM, HOSAIN T | 2100 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Apr 06, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial