Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Remedy Robotics Inc.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Remedy Robotics Inc. currently has 3 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are handled by 2 distinct examiners, indicating a concentrated prosecution effort. The workload is shared among a small group of USPTO personnel, which may allow for more focused communication during the examination process.

The busiest examiner for the company is DAVIS, AMELIE R, who is responsible for 2 pending office actions. Because this examiner manages 2 of the 3 pending actions, their feedback is particularly influential for the company's overall patent strategy. The portfolio also involves multiple art units, requiring the applicant to adhere to the standards of different administrative divisions.

The fact that multiple pending office actions are assigned to a single examiner suggests an opportunity to develop a consistent rapport with DAVIS, AMELIE R. This concentration within the distinct art units simplifies the administrative landscape compared to more dispersed portfolios. Practitioners can prioritize the preferences of the busiest examiner to resolve the bulk of the current workload.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (33%)
2
Medium (67%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (67%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DAVIS, AMELIE R 2 65.1% +33.2%
WHITROCK, ZACHARIAH KIRBY 1 100.0% +0.0%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18676954 SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND DEVICES FOR ADVANCING AN ENDOVASCULAR INSTRUMENT WHITROCK, ZACHARIAH KIRBY —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18352491 IMAGE SPACE CONTROL FOR ENDOVASCULAR TOOLS DAVIS, AMELIE R 87d overdue
18888616 VISION-BASED POSITION AND ORIENTATION DETERMINATION FOR ENDOVASCULAR TOOLS DAVIS, AMELIE R —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3798 2
3783 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18888616 VISION-BASED POSITION AND ORIENTATION DETERMINATION FOR ENDOVASCULAR TOOLS DAVIS, AMELIE R 3798 §103Other Final Rejection — Pending Sep 18, 2024
18676954 SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND DEVICES FOR ADVANCING AN ENDOVASCULAR INSTRUMENT WHITROCK, ZACHARIAH KIRBY 3783 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 29, 2024
18352491 IMAGE SPACE CONTROL FOR ENDOVASCULAR TOOLS DAVIS, AMELIE R 3798 §103Other Non-Final OA 87d overdue Pending Jul 14, 2023

Managing Remedy Robotics Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Remedy Robotics Inc. have?

Remedy Robotics Inc. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Remedy Robotics Inc. applications?

Amelie R Davis has the most, with 2 of Remedy Robotics Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Remedy Robotics Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month