Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Renaissant Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This matter is being handled by a single distinct examiner and a sole distinct art unit, indicating a narrow and specific prosecution focus at this time. Such a profile suggests that the company is currently prioritizing a single core invention within this technical sector. This concentration allows the applicant to focus all legal and technical resources on a single set of patent claims.
The busiest examiner, JOSEPH, TONYA S, is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Because the total pending office actions also equals this amount, this examiner is currently the only individual at the patent office reviewing the company's active applications. This concentration requires the company to focus its legal strategy on the specific examination style and technical interpretations of this individual examiner. The final outcome of the current prosecution will depend on successfully navigating the requirements set forth by this one official.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| JOSEPH, TONYA S | 1 | 24.1% | +19.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18435748 | SHIPPING YARD AUTOMATION SYSTEM | JOSEPH, TONYA S | 39d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18435748 | SHIPPING YARD AUTOMATION SYSTEM | JOSEPH, TONYA S | 39d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3628 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18435748 | SHIPPING YARD AUTOMATION SYSTEM | JOSEPH, TONYA S | 3628 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | 39d | Pending | Feb 07, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial