Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Renmatix currently has 1 pending office action within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This single active matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, reflecting a focused and limited prosecution pipeline at this time. The involvement of 1 distinct art unit indicates that the company's current legal efforts in Chemistry & Materials are concentrated within a specific regulatory group at the patent office.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is MINSKEY, JACOB T, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. This means that the company's current pending office actions are under the review of this one individual. For practitioners, this concentration implies that the outcome of the current Chemistry & Materials portfolio is entirely dependent on the examination style and preferences of a single examiner. Understanding the specific tendencies of this examiner is crucial, as there are no other active matters to balance the risk or provide alternative paths to allowance within the current data set.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MINSKEY, JACOB T | 1 | 69.3% | +33.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18881600 | CELLULOSE-CONTAINING COMPOSITIONS, METHODS FOR THEIR PREPARATION, AND USES COMPRISING THEM | MINSKEY, JACOB T | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18881600 | CELLULOSE-CONTAINING COMPOSITIONS, METHODS FOR THEIR PREPARATION, AND USES COMPRISING THEM | MINSKEY, JACOB T | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1748 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18881600 | CELLULOSE-CONTAINING COMPOSITIONS, METHODS FOR THEIR PREPARATION, AND USES COMPRISING THEM | MINSKEY, JACOB T | 1748 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 06, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial