Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Repligen Corporation

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 7 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Repligen Corporation currently has 3 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These 3 actions are being reviewed by 3 distinct examiners, indicating a lack of examiner concentration. However, these matters are grouped within 2 distinct art units, suggesting some technical overlap in the company's current pending workload even as it engages with multiple examiners.

The busiest examiner for the portfolio is BREWSTER, HAYDEN R, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Because each of the 3 pending actions is assigned to a different examiner, no single individual handles the majority of the workload. This distribution requires practitioners to adapt to three different examination styles across the 3 pending matters. The lack of examiner overlap means that each application must be managed as a separate prosecution track with its own unique requirements.

The use of 2 distinct art units within the Chemistry & Materials field shows that the company's innovations are being scrutinized by at least two different technical groups. With 3 distinct examiners involved, the prosecution landscape is diverse for a portfolio of this size. Practitioners must manage three separate timelines and sets of examiner requirements to move these 3 pending office actions forward. A coordinated approach is necessary to ensure that the specific feedback from each examiner is addressed while maintaining the overall goals for the portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Double-patenting + other1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
67% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
33% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BREWSTER, HAYDEN R 1 62.7% +46.8%
CARREON, ADRIAN JOHN 1 100.0% +0.0%
BASS, DIRK R 1 62.4% +22.8%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18200112 RECOVERY OF PERFUSION BLEED PRODUCT VIA ALTERNATING TANGENTIAL FLOW FILTRATION IN A SEDIMENTATION REACTOR CARREON, ADRIAN JOHN 10d overdue
18123917 VARIABLE PATHLENGTH UV SPECTROSCOPY BASED AUTOMATED TFF SYSTEM BASS, DIRK R 55d

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18123917 VARIABLE PATHLENGTH UV SPECTROSCOPY BASED AUTOMATED TFF SYSTEM BASS, DIRK R 55d
18748880 FILTRATION SYSTEM AND METHOD BREWSTER, HAYDEN R —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1799 1
1779 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18748880 FILTRATION SYSTEM AND METHOD BREWSTER, HAYDEN R — §103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 20, 2024
18200112 RECOVERY OF PERFUSION BLEED PRODUCT VIA ALTERNATING TANGENTIAL FLOW FILTRATION IN A SEDIMENTATION REACTOR CARREON, ADRIAN JOHN 1799 §103§112 Non-Final OA 10d overdue Pending May 22, 2023
18123917 VARIABLE PATHLENGTH UV SPECTROSCOPY BASED AUTOMATED TFF SYSTEM BASS, DIRK R 1779 §103§112 Non-Final OA 55d Pending Mar 20, 2023

Managing Repligen Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month