Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Research Development Foundation

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

11 pending office actions • 7 art units • 11 examiners • 0 of 11 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Research Development Foundation has 11 pending office actions in Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals. The portfolio spans 11 distinct examiners and 7 distinct art units, indicating substantial examiner dispersion with some concentration within technical groups.

LAU, MICHAEL J is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending matter. Since the examiner count matches the pending-action count, portfolio management should emphasize individual examiner histories, while art-unit grouping can help identify broader biotechnology prosecution patterns.

The profile supports a coordinated docketing process that preserves matter-level analysis. Counsel should avoid assuming that one amendment or argument will transfer across all assignments, because the matters are distributed among multiple examiners and art units.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

11
Total Pending OAs
8
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

6
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (6)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (45%)
4
Medium (36%)
2
Easy (18%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (18%)
§112 only2 (18%)
Double-patenting + other2 (18%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (45%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

8
Life Sciences
73% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
27% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

110 h
Manual time on pending OAs
22 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
38 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.0 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LAU, MICHAEL J 1 72.3% +23.2%
RAHMAN, MASUDUR 1 72.9% +31.7%
ARIANI, KADE 1 75.0% +32.0%
PAGUIO FRISING, MICHELLE F 1 71.2% +38.9%
BUTTICE, AUDREY L 1 46.6% +26.0%
BEHARRY, ZANNA MARIA 1 25.0% +56.3%
FAN, LYNN Y 1 47.3% +49.8%
NOBLE, MARCIA STEPHENS 1 67.2% +39.5%
LI, RUIXIANG 1 59.5% +18.7%
ANJARIA, SHREYA PARAG 1 53.7% +26.8%

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18332571 ENGINEERED FCRIIB SELECTIVE IGG1 FC VARIANTS AND USES THEREOF BUTTICE, AUDREY L 28d overdue
18248739 METHODS FOR MAKING AND USING DIFFERENTIATED NEURAL CELLS BEHARRY, ZANNA MARIA 19d overdue
18980005 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CORONARY OCCLUSION TREATMENT LAU, MICHAEL J —
18855867 METHODS FOR MAKING AND USING DIFFERENTIATED NEURAL CELLS RAHMAN, MASUDUR —
17611315 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR HIGH-SPEED AND HIGH-ASPECT RATIO LASER SUBTRACTIVE MATERIAL PROCESSING FEDORKY, MEGAN TAYLOR —

Interview Candidates (10)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17548467 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR LASER-INDUCED CALCIUM FRACTURES ANJARIA, SHREYA PARAG 134d overdue
18060134 METHODS AND PROBIOTIC COMPOSITIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF BONE DISORDERS FAN, LYNN Y 79d overdue
18052476 SERINE PROTEASE MOLECULES AND THERAPIES LI, RUIXIANG 77d overdue
18332571 ENGINEERED FCRIIB SELECTIVE IGG1 FC VARIANTS AND USES THEREOF BUTTICE, AUDREY L 28d overdue
18248739 METHODS FOR MAKING AND USING DIFFERENTIATED NEURAL CELLS BEHARRY, ZANNA MARIA 19d overdue
18060183 ELIMINATION OF PROLIFERATING CELLS FROM STEM CELL-DERIVED GRAFTS NOBLE, MARCIA STEPHENS 17d overdue
18413541 METHODS AND PROBIOTIC COMPOSITIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF METABOLIC DISEASES AND DISORDERS PAGUIO FRISING, MICHELLE F 84d
18980005 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CORONARY OCCLUSION TREATMENT LAU, MICHAEL J —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3796 3
1651 2
1632 2
1633 1
1647 1
1759 1
1674 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18980005 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CORONARY OCCLUSION TREATMENT LAU, MICHAEL J 3796 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 13, 2024
18855867 METHODS FOR MAKING AND USING DIFFERENTIATED NEURAL CELLS RAHMAN, MASUDUR 1633 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 10, 2024
18619514 COMBINATION THERAPIES FOR THE TREATMENT OF DISEASES ARIANI, KADE 1651 §103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 28, 2024
18413541 METHODS AND PROBIOTIC COMPOSITIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF METABOLIC DISEASES AND DISORDERS PAGUIO FRISING, MICHELLE F 1651 §103DP Non-Final OA 84d Pending Jan 16, 2024
18332571 ENGINEERED FCRIIB SELECTIVE IGG1 FC VARIANTS AND USES THEREOF BUTTICE, AUDREY L 1647 §103§112 Final Rejection 28d overdue Pending Jun 09, 2023
18248739 METHODS FOR MAKING AND USING DIFFERENTIATED NEURAL CELLS BEHARRY, ZANNA MARIA 1632 §103§112Other Final Rejection 19d overdue Pending Apr 12, 2023
18060134 METHODS AND PROBIOTIC COMPOSITIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF BONE DISORDERS FAN, LYNN Y 1759 §103 Non-Final OA 79d overdue Pending Nov 30, 2022
18060183 ELIMINATION OF PROLIFERATING CELLS FROM STEM CELL-DERIVED GRAFTS NOBLE, MARCIA STEPHENS 1632 §112 Final Rejection 17d overdue Pending Nov 30, 2022
18052476 SERINE PROTEASE MOLECULES AND THERAPIES LI, RUIXIANG 1674 §112 Non-Final OA 77d overdue Pending Nov 03, 2022
17548467 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR LASER-INDUCED CALCIUM FRACTURES ANJARIA, SHREYA PARAG 3796 §103 Non-Final OA 134d overdue Pending Dec 10, 2021
17611315 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR HIGH-SPEED AND HIGH-ASPECT RATIO LASER SUBTRACTIVE MATERIAL PROCESSING FEDORKY, MEGAN TAYLOR 3796 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 15, 2021

Managing Research Development Foundation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Research Development Foundation have?

Research Development Foundation has 11 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 7 art units and 11 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Research Development Foundation applications?

Michael J Lau has the most, with 1 of Research Development Foundation's pending office actions.

What technology area are Research Development Foundation's patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month