3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (33%) |
| §102 only | 1 (33%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (33%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BAUM, ZACHARY JOHN | 1 | 81.6% | +15.0% |
| EINHORN, MICA JILLIAN | 1 | 100.0% | +0.0% |
| KRCHA, MATTHEW D | 1 | 65.0% | +35.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18562077 | TAYLOR CONE EMITTER DEVICES AND TAYLOR CONE ANALYSIS SYSTEMS | EINHORN, MICA JILLIAN | 11d overdue |
| 18293203 | SILICA-PASSIVATED ARTICLE AND METHOD FOR FORMING | BAUM, ZACHARY JOHN | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18558405 | TAYLOR CONE EMITTER DEVICE RESPOSITORY, TAYLOR CONE EMITTER DEVICE RESPOSITORY SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR ANALYZING A POPULATION OF SAMPLES | KRCHA, MATTHEW D | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18293203 | SILICA-PASSIVATED ARTICLE AND METHOD FOR FORMING | BAUM, ZACHARY JOHN | — |
| 18558405 | TAYLOR CONE EMITTER DEVICE RESPOSITORY, TAYLOR CONE EMITTER DEVICE RESPOSITORY SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR ANALYZING A POPULATION OF SAMPLES | KRCHA, MATTHEW D | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2881 | 1 |
| 1796 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18293203 | SILICA-PASSIVATED ARTICLE AND METHOD FOR FORMING | BAUM, ZACHARY JOHN | — | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 29, 2024 |
| 18562077 | TAYLOR CONE EMITTER DEVICES AND TAYLOR CONE ANALYSIS SYSTEMS | EINHORN, MICA JILLIAN | 2881 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 11d overdue | Pending | Nov 17, 2023 |
| 18558405 | TAYLOR CONE EMITTER DEVICE RESPOSITORY, TAYLOR CONE EMITTER DEVICE RESPOSITORY SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR ANALYZING A POPULATION OF SAMPLES | KRCHA, MATTHEW D | 1796 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 01, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial